
What I like about Earl Sholley, the Conservative Republican who has decided to run against Barney Frank in the 2010 elections is his ability to find simple solutions to complex problems. Career politicians quite often have a hard time with simplicity because political considerations enter the arena of ideas and gum up the works big time, as has been the case in the matter of health care reform.
For example, when discussing the critical area of national security, Mr. Sholley states very clearly on his website (http://www.sholleyforcongress.us) that the goal is to keep Americans safe. But of course if someone like Vice President Joe Biden heard Sholley’s “Keep Americans Safe” proposal he would react the same way he did when he told Sarah Palan “Drill Baby Drill” was to simplistic a solution for bringing down oil prices even though she never said that was her only solution.
And that would be just further proof that we would be correct in suspecting that the Obama administration and the Congressional Leadership group which is running things now doesn’t seem to get this . If they did they wouldn’t have set out on a course to completely dismantle the terrorist interrogation apparatus that had such great success during the Bush years in averting future attacks.
But it has now become apparent that change indeed has taken place, as Obama promised all during the campaign without going into details, for as change concerns National security issues we are definitely not as safe as we once were. First we had the Fort Hood attack followed by the Christmas Day Bombing Attempt. And now it is being reported that 20 other young Muslim men are already prepared and trained to blow up more aircraft. This disturbing information was learned from UK intelligence officials and is based upon statements Omar Farouk Abdulmulab boasted during his initial “lawyer-less” interrogation sessions. But since they allowed him to “lawyer up”, we are no longer able to conduct a genuine threat analysis. I’m certain we’ll obtain more details about these fine young Muslim men after they start blowing themselves up in airplanes in the wild blue yonder above us and human body parts and debris starting falling out of the sky. Does it sound like somebody is finally starting to make wise decisions at the top? I think not and so do you.
My initial reaction to the tragic shooting at Ford Hood was quite different than the reactions of the mainstream liberal media which went way out of its way to portray the perpetrator of this horrible, horrible crime as suffering from Post Traumatic Stress syndrome. Immediately I found this quite odd because he had never been in combat before. (Duh…..You think?)And when it was announced that his name was Nadal Milak Hassan instead of John Adams Smith, I really wasn’t surprised that the media refused to mention the forbidden “T” word in any of their stories until it became clear that Hassan had undeniably radical views and had even exchanged 18 emails with radical Yemeni cleric Awlaki whose communications were being monitored under court ordered surveillance. (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/01/07/eveningnews/main6069298.shtml?tag=contentMain;contentBody)
I would imagine at this point that if Earl Sholley’s over all strategy of doing everything possible to keep Americans safe were in place, then the 18 emails would have been passed on to the Terrorism Task Force responsible for determining whether Hassan had posed a threat or not but they never saw all 18 emails. In fact the task force decided Hassan was not dangerous at all which led to the Pentagon not knowing that a US Army Officer was e-mailing a radical Islamic Cleric suspected of being a recruiter for Al Qaeda, something that would surely have set off red flags, or at least I hope it would have. But I’m not sure because it seems that the military services have become much more politically correct than they were when I served between 1971 and 1997. (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/01/08/cbsnews_investigates/main6073415.shtml?tag=cbsnewsLeadStoriesArea)
It’s also beginning to become apparent that because information had not been disseminated properly the dots were not being connected and the subsequent disaster was unavoidable. Yet because the investigation and analysis of these failures was so painfully slow and without the urgency one would have expected during the Bush years lessons were not learned quickly enough to ensure that similar intelligence failures would not lead to the type of near disaster that occurred this past Christmas.
I’m not a counterterrorism expert but I like to think that I am capable of making an abundance of common sense decisions if nothing else. I’ve done a lot of traveling and spent a lot of time at many of the world’s busiest airports. I’ve been interrogated at the airport in Tel Aviv, Israel and scrutinized in the most thourough manner imaginable. While standing in line I was questioned by two different screeners as to why I did or didn’t do a variety of things while vacationing in Israel around 1994 during a relative period of peace. They wanted to know why I had spent the entire week in Jerusalem and hadn’t traveled the country like most tourists do. Finally they became convinced that I was telling the truth when I got flustered and told them I was simply a Senior Chief Petty Officer in the United States Navy on leave who came to Israel for a little R&R rather than for an exhaustive investigation into all of Israel’s remarkable and historic sights. They believed me when they saw my growing frustration with their methods and decided to back off. Now that I reflect upon it I have to agree it was a logical line of questioning, even if I did not fit a certain profile they were obviously concerned about.
You see they were looking for someone who could be a possible terrorist by looking at him straight in the eye and making a “common sense” evaluation based on his demographic profile and behavior while standing in line answering direct questions. They weren’t just going through the motions using state-of-the-art weapons detection and screening devices while wondering when they’ll be able to take there next break and if they’ll finally be able to enjoy a decent cup of coffee in peace for a change.
We’ll probably never know if this was the case or not in Amsterdam when a rich man’s son from Nigeria traveling alone without a passport was allowed to enter an aircraft flying to the United States, even though his name appeared on a Terrorist Watch List. We also don’t know if his strange indifferent demeanor was similar to that shown during his subsequent courtroom appearance nor do we know if he displayed the same look of icy cold death in his eyes that should have got the attention of professional security personnel but obviously didn’t .
What we do know however is that he arrived in Addis Ababa, Ghana on December 9 after spending five months in Al Qaeda training camps in Yemen. We also know that when the suspect’s father reported his concerns about his son to the CIA, the reaction of our country’s Terrorist detection apparatus was one of apathy. Obviously they weren’t at the level of readiness they should have been if someone or some agency or some task force were diligently connecting the dots. That’s just common sense isn’t it? I bet Barney Frank thinks so. Well, maybe not. But I bet Earl Sholley does.
If it weren’t for the passengers who quickly subdued him after he attempted to ignite the explosives packed tightly in his crotch. we would still be paying tribute more than likely to all the victims of a terrible aviation disaster, rather than a failed attempt at a blatant terrorist attack.
In my opinion the times have changed considerably since the Bush days when at least we could fall asleep at night knowing that our government was doing everything in its power to protect us.
The whole system back then utilized common- sense decision making methods to the hilt even if they did over reach at times, which many distinguished legal scholars believe they did not. One can not argue with the fact however that Al-Qaeda was unable to launch a single attack on the United States during the Bush years largely because they made the common sense decision to recognize it as a war from the very beginning.
It wasn’t until very recently, however that President Obama’s Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, even mentioned the word terrorism which is simply outrageous and makes you wonder what President Obama was thinking when he appointed her to this extremely important position.
Keeping dangerous terrorists locked up at the Detention and Interrogation Center at Guantanomo Bay, Cuba not only struck me as a pragmatic solution to the problem but a stroke of true genius for many reasons. And holding them for military tribunals was another no brainier and an example of common sense decision making that should be considered for entry into the Common Sense Decisions Hall of Fame
But where is the evidence that common sense decisions are still being made in light of the decision to move suspected terrorists to the mainland of the United States and allow them to enjoy the same rights and protections that residents and citizens of this great country enjoy. Where is the common sense when you give evil cold blooded Gihadist killers a ready made venue for unleashing venomous attacks and propaganda on the US in front of the entire world? How is this decision going to help keep Americans safe?
It won’t but it does give an emphatic and disturbing answer to a question that has troubled me ever since it became clear that Liberal Democrats had a very good chance of regaining control of both the Congress and the White House. The question was Can Democrats Be Trusted with National Security? And the answer based upon a dizzying array of foolish decisions made during the first year of their return to the bastion of power in Washington D.C. was a resounding NO!
And the reasons were as follows: (1) A Liberal’s World View won’t allow for that to happen. (2)The old 1960’s anti-war, love and peace crowd won’t allow that to happen. (3)The idea that America is to blame for everything that is wrong in the world won’t allow that to happen. (4) The tendency of our new president to apologize to the part of the world that views such actions as weakness won’t allow that to happen. (5) and finally the tendency of the President to expect to be able to reason with people who have been taught to hate the ”infidels” in the non-muslim world with a passion won’t allow for that to happen.
So the only conclusion I can come to is that common sense decision making is not being made in the Oval office anymore or the Department of Homeland Security, or in any other agency charged with protecting us from further terrorist attacks.
You know I’m right. You know Earl Sholley is right. And you know every registered voter in the country will be right in November when they vote to bring common sense decision making back to the Massachusetts Fourth Congressional District and the entire country as well.