Jul 29, 2014

Anti Illegal Immigration Rally on Aug 9, 2014 in Bourne, MA

PLEASE JOIN US FOR A RALLY OPPOSING ILLEGAL CHILDREN COMING TO JOINT BASE CAPE COD AND ALL ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION

SATURDAY, AUGUST 9, 2014 (The President’s Arrival Date at Otis)

11:00AM - 2:00PM HELD IN FRONT OF THE STATE POLICE BARRACKS AT THE BOURNE ROTARY, BOURNE, MA

WE THE PEOPLE OF THIS COMMONWEALTH AND THIS COUNTRY MUST MAKE OUR VOICES HEARD! WE CANNOT STAND BY WHILE THE WISHES OF A FEW ARE FORCED UPON US. PLEASE STAND WITH US.

PLEASE PARK DOWN THE STREET AT MARKED LOCATIONS ON TROWBRIDGE ROAD. THOSE WHO HAVE DIFFICULTY WALKING WILL BE SHUTTLED TO THE ROTARY. THERE WILL BE NO WALKING ACROSS THE ROTARY FOR SAFETY REASONS.

PLEASE KEEP SIGNS CIVIL AND RESPECTFUL.

WE HOPE TO SEE EVERYONE THERE!

Jul 27, 2014

Anti-illegal immigration rally in Boston shows rebellion picking up steam

People in Massachusetts are fed up with the Obama administrations open door policy for illegal immigrants crossing our southern border and being flown to Massachusetts and housed on military bases and government facilities. Yesterday thousands showed up at the MA State House to show their disapproval openly. They weren't rowdy, just "mad as hell" as WRKO radio host Jeff Kuhner, who organized the event, described it. Republican Gubernatorial Candidate Mark Fisher kicked off the event with a stirring speech. His oppointment in the September Republican Primary, Charlie Baker was a no show, as was expected. The video is basically raw and unedited but it captures the spirit of the event. Keep in mind that these protests that are now poping up all over the country are not about hate and cruelty as the liberal mainstream media is trying to make us believe, but it is about love. Love for country. It's a despicable plan to tilt the scales in favor of the Democrat party and forever destroy the two party electoral system and must be stopped now. We are a soverign nation and have a right to control our borders.

Jul 23, 2014

Do you remember when the US president was the leader of the free world?


For as long as I can remember the person who occupied the position of President of the United States was someone who was recognized by nations all over the world, as the leader of the free world, not just the leader of the United States of America.

Our present president, Barrack Hussein Obama, has certainly been working diligently to change that image.

And if you are a member of the growing segment of the US population, who thinks the decline of US leadership in the world is in fact a good thing, I ask you to consider this:

If the leader of the free world no longer exists, how much longer do you think the free world itself will be able to survive? And who is going to fill the gap, when the United States is gone, or is no longer a factor on the world scene..

I grew up in the 1950’s in the backdrop of the Cold War, when every international conflict brought the Soviet Union and the United States to the brink of nuclear war.

I remember strong US presidents who understood the extent of the military power they had at their disposal during the Cold War, like President Eisenhower, and how we trusted them to make the right decision in national security matters.

And I remember hearing Soviet premier Nikita Krushev confidently declare to all Americans at that time that their grandchildren would live under communism.

Because of the leadership of strong US presidents since that time until the fall of the Soviet Union while Ronald Reagan was president, Krushev’s threat never came to fruition, but the image of him, barbarically, pounding his shoe on his desk at the United Nations has stayed with me all these years.

Previous presidents, who recognized their role as leaders of the free world knew who the bad guys were`.

For example, Israel was always one of the good guys and HAMAS, which was founded by those same Nazis that killed 6 million jews  in Europe during World War II and will not sleep until every Jew has vanished from the face of the earth, was one of the bad guys, but not anymore.

I remember JFK standing up to this same Nikita Krushev and Fidel Castro in the Cuban missile crisis and watching Krushev blink when forced to the brink of annihilation.

There was no whining, or na├»ve lectures given on civility by the Secretary of State, as John Kerry is prone to do, and who actually looks incredulous, when aggressive, lying, murderous thugs, like Vladimir Putin and Bashar al Assad reveal their true colors. 

When the Soviet Union or one of its satellite nations crossed the line back then, or a regional conflict broke out in the middle east, the nation's military readiness went to a higher level of alert immediately, no questions asked, as our enemies knew it would.

And when a US ambassador in a foreign land cried out for help, the President did everything in his considerable power to get him and his staff out of there immediately. Secret rescue missions happened all the time, usually with little publicity. And collisions between US Navy ships and Soviet nuclear submarines happened more times than you might think.

Back then a red line in the sand was truly a red line in the sand, and there were consequences to pay when it was crossed.

It had to be that way, if the credibility of our Commander in Chief was to stay intact, as leader of the free world.

Furthermore, it was well understood by mature adults, no matter what their age, that only the ability to wage war with overwhelming force at any given moment was the only effective deterrent to war and the only language demagogues set upon world domination understood.

When the same JFK appeared in West Berlin, it was clear the leader of the Western World had arrived to take a stand against communist aggression by identifying with the citizens on both sides of the wall and boldly declaring: “Ich bin ein Berliner”.

Why don’t we hear President Obama saying something similar, demonstrating solidarity with the freedom loving people of Israel, or Iraq where multitudes of Christians are being beheaded by ISIS after Obama refused to launch the drone attacks requested by the Iraqi government; or the Ukraine, as the Soviet bear wakes up next store from a long cold winter, and not only threatens his neighbors, but shoots down passenger jets filled with innocent civilians.

And I won’t even get into what President Ronald Wilson Reagan told Mikail Gorbachev what he could do with his wall, nor what he said when the same communists shot down a Korean passenger airliner traveling from New York to Seoul, killing 269 people.

I’ll tell you what he didn’t do though. He didn’t shrug his shoulders and prance off to a fundraiser, cracking jokes, and eating cheeseburgers.

And he also didn’t beat around the bush, while more airliners dropped from the sky, courtesy of sophisticated Russian missiles, directed by highly trained Russian missile technicians, masquerading as Russian separatists.

He put the blame squarley where it belonged, without hesitation, on the shoulders of his Russian counterpart.

This was a deadly serious moment and the US president didn’t back down because he knew that he was more than the President of the United States. He was the leader of the free world. He didn’t have to wait for a bogus UN investigation.

And every freedom loving person in the world understood this, and depended on him to act accordingly. 

 



 

Jul 1, 2014

SCOTUS DEFENDS RELIGIOUS LIBERTY: Ginsburg provides ammunition to defenders of traditional marriage


US Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (http;//www.biography.com)




What is most remarkable about the Hobby Lobby ruling by the U.S. Supreme Cout, which gives the Christian owners the right to assert their free exercise of religion rights from the first Amendment of the US Constitution is that it was necessary in the first place to even have a ruling.

I mean why would something as plain as day as our religious liberty rights be batted around in the media as though something very new and strange was suddenly thrust upon the American people .

Of course, I know the answer to that question.

It only appears strange against the backdrop of one political party’s all out assault on the constitution through intrusive government regulation,  which necessitated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) that the Supreme Court based it’s decision on.

I repeat. It was not a decision based on Constitutional law, as the White House is implying by referring to “the Constitutional Lawyer” who works in the Oval Office, and is studying the decision,  but it was based on statuatory law.

What’s ironical is that the political party that has been engaged in all out warfare on our constitution, of course, is the Democrat party and the President who signed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act into law was none other than Bill Clinton, who along with his wife, Hillary Clinton,  have both been aggressively lashing out against the decision that is based on his own law.

Although we have been barraged with very predictable propaganda by the democrats and their media already, saying  the scope of the ruling was narrow, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in her descent made it quite clear she doesn’t believe it is narrow at all, suggesting that it could even be used in court by those who oppose same sex marriage on religious grounds, which will make evangelical Christians and muslims strange bedfellows in her debt, indeed and united for a common cause: to save the institution of marriage.

On the other hand I wonder how the GLBTQ community will feel about her suggestions offered so generously and forth rightly to a segment of society they despise: Christians and Muslims.

I don’t think it would be going too far to assert  that Ginsburg seemed to be opening up a can of worms in her very long opinion, which is sure to incite the homosexual community, and I also note that “our dear leader” seems to be salivating at  the opportunity to use the decision to rile up liberals, especially women, for fundraising purposes, when a simple solution would be to have the insurance companies pay for the cost of contraceptives, as the administration has done in the case of non profit organizations.

But if he did that, President Obama wouldn’t be able to prolong his fictitious war on women, which he blames on republicans, out of sheer political chicanery, though this decision did nothing to prevent women from acquiring as many birth control devices as they wish, courtesy of Planned Parenthood, or their local Target or Walmart where they may purchase a month’s supply for $9.00, even if he won’t help them out by requiring Insurance companies to pay for them.

But campaign fundraising is too important to Obama, I imagine, with the Democrats on the verge of losing the Senate to the Republicans according to the latest polls and the President ranting childishly and threatening to use  his pen and phone like some tin pot banana republic dictator, in violation of the constitution, instead of acting in accordance with the constitutionally mandated Separation of powers he swore a sacred oath to protect and defend.
 
 

Jun 30, 2014

Could What Happened in the Mississippi Primary Happen in Massachusetts?


In case you think that what happened in Mississippi couldn’t possibly happen in Massachusetts, I ask you to contemplate the following scenario.

If the primary election between Baker and Fisher were so close that a run-off was necessitated. Don’t you think that democrats would work with the GOP establishment republicans to scare democrat voters into voting  for Baker, just to keep the pro life, anti-illegal immigration candidate, Mark Fisher, from winning?

Sure it would be an unethical and despicable breach of conduct as well as a clear violation of the law, but may I remind you who we are dealing with here.

These are the same people who changed the voting tallies at the MA GOP State Convention to keep Mark Fisher off the primary ballot.

And it would have worked if the courts hadn’t pressured the MA GOP to wipe the egg off their face and allow Fisher his rightful place on the ballot, by ordering a trial by jury, thus ending the lawsuit for now anyway.

These are also the same people who sent a well respected conservative activist and leader to Mark Fisher, as an intermediary, between Fisher and a Democrat fat cat, with an offer of a plush State cabinet post in return for withdrawing from the gubernatorial race.

At the risk of alienating some of my conservative friends, I believe that ill-advised transaction constitutes the equivalency of a bribe, whether money was mentioned or not, as part of the deal, which I don’t believe it was, though Mark Fisher believes at the very least it was implied.

Either way it was still a bribe and anyone involved in the transaction should have stayed far away from it, though it does not appear to have been illegal.

 It just smells bad.

The same way it smelled bad when former Mitt Romney’s guy, MA GOP Chairman Bob Maginn,  offered State Committee members offers of free meals, drinks, and free support for their web sites if they would vote for Maginn as Chairman of the MA GOP, a strategy that worked.

Then there was the Liberty Slate massacre; the Kirsten Hughes era accompanied by her political sugar daddy’s, Scott Brown, Ron Kaufman, and William Weld and his fair haired boy, Charlie Baker.

And I won’t even mention House Minority Leader, Battlin Brad Jones, of whom I said in my previous post:  “The Lions in their dens tremble at his presence”, steeling a quote from the Academy Award winning movie, "Patton".

 Well nobody said that about Brad Jones and ever will, but I'm in a sarcastic mood this morning, and  couldn't help myself. ______________________________________________________________________________

Previous Posts On the Same Subject

MA Proposed Voter ID Bills Need to be Amended Further 6/29/2014

Eight Voter ID Bills Pending in MA Legislature Amid Growing National Trend

 
 

Jun 29, 2014

MA Proposed Voter ID Bills Need to be Amended Further


If Massachusetts Conservatives and Tea Party activists learned anything from watching the GOP Primary election in Mississippi this week,  it was that both parties need monitoring when it comes to dirty tricks and compromises in voter integrity at the polls.

And with 8 voter ID bills still circulating on Beacon Hill, as discussed in the June edition of Boston Broadside, as well as at the Jazz Patriot,  or languishing unattended in a dusty committee room inbox someplace, it now appears that those bills need to be amended further, if someone can actually find them.

                                                 Voting is wonderful the second time around

Run-off elections present opportunities for voters who voted for their party’s candidate in the primary to vote for the opposition party’s candidate in a run-off election.  Apparently it doesn’t seem to matter that in Mississippi, there is a law on the books preventing such actions.

Which necessitates the need for alert poll watchers during elections, as I also discussed in my previous article.

A petition currently being circulated online by the Christy McDaniels campaign says: “Mississippi election law states, any voter who casts their primary ballot for a member of their party may not crossover and cast a vote in the other political party’s run-off election.

So I suggest that one of the now very lonely and neglected, voter ID bills that I wrote about in the June edition of Boston Broadside, entitled 8 Voter ID Bills Proposed in Mass, which can also be seen at www.bostonbroadside.com, be amended  to include safeguards to prevent voters from voting for two different parties during run-off elections.

Of course we realize that neither political party in Massachusetts, would ever try to pull off such a stunt as was attempted by Mississippi Democrats, who used fear mongering techniques and racist overtones on robo calls and flyers that lied  about tea party candidates and scared democrat voters half to death.

NOT!
As I wrote previously: Most proposed legislation requires a valid government issued photo identification card and some bills, such as H.3308, which was submitted by the house minority leader, “Battlin Brad Jones”, of whom it has been said, “The lions in their dens tremble at his presence”,  even require valid proof of residence if requested by an election official, such as a copy of a current utility bill, bank statement, government check, or other government document that shows the name and address of the person requesting to vote.

Now it seems that will not be enough, if we are to ensure genuine voter integrity at the polls.
__________________________________________________________________________
Previous Posts at the Jazz Patriot on this subject
Eight Voter ID Bills pending in MA Legislature amid growing national trend 
Could What Happened in the Mississippi Primary Happen in Massachusetts 6/30/2014

Jun 19, 2014

Justina Pelletier Returns to her famiily


The Free Justina Pelletier Clock has been removed from the Jazz Patriot blog after Justina Pelletier spent 480 days in captivity at the hands of Governor Deval Patrick, the Mass State Legislature, the MA Juvenile Court System, the DCF (Department of Children and Families) and last but not least, Children’s Hospital, which in my opinion engaged in an act of pure EVIL!!!

The reputation of all of the above mentioned parties has been smeared for ever, after taking advantage of a child ripped out of her family’s hands and taken control by the DCF, for the purpose of receiving large sums of research dollars and using her as a guinea pig.

The only consolation is that a national campaign is under way to see that “Justina” laws are implemented across the country to prevent such abuses from taking place again against another unsuspecting American family.

I hope that justice is served in this case and that criminal charges are brought against all those who had a role in this despicable crime against humanity. If Children’s hospital falls into a giant sinkhole or is sued into oblivion, I won’t be upset as there are great hospitals everywhere which will be able to take up the slack, including Tufts Medical Center where doctors there disagreed with a young doctor's diagnosis at Boston Children's hospital, that set this whole bizarre affair into motion.

From the very beginning Americans across the country knew instinctively that this was wrong. Even liberal attorney and Harvard University Professor Alan Dershowitz, took sides against Childrens Hospital which is a teaching hospital in the Harvard University system, by saying when a conflict in medical diagnosis of a child occurs, the final decision must be made by the child's parents. Any other action is unconstitutional Dershowitz stated on national television on the Mike Huckabee Show. .

Congratulations to all those who worked tirelessly on getting Justina Pelletier released, through your righteous activism, including letter writing campaigns, on line commentary, calls to talk radio shows, attendance at rallies, and prayers. The State's armor cracked under intense public pressure and Justina is now with her family. Praise the Lord!